Money-laundering oversight to be delayed
Alleged cases of financial crime to be assessed ahead of reformEuropost
The EU finance ministers are set to delay a reform of money laundering supervision at banks next week because they first want to assess recent alleged cases of financial crime at the bloc's lenders, according to a draft document seen by Reuters. The text, to be adopted on 4 December, backs a need “to strengthen the effectiveness of the current framework” after recent scandals, but does not propose institutional or legislative changes, like the creation of an EU-wide supervisor recommended by the ECB.
The document details an action plan that is meant to be the EU response to a series of high-profile cases of alleged money laundering at banks in several Member States, including Denmark, Estonia, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, Spain, the Netherlands, Britain and Cyprus. The plan foresees a review of recent bank scandals that could delay indefinitely legislative changes already proposed by the Commission in September to bolster supervision of banks against money-laundering risks.
The Commission's proposal would have given the European Banking Authority slightly bigger powers to oversee money laundering and would increase from one to 12 the agency's staff in charge of monitoring financial crime at thousands of banks in the EU. The overhaul was seen as under-ambitious by many observers and did not address major loopholes that make sanctions irrelevant. But some EU states, including Luxembourg and the Netherlands, are opposing the overhaul in a bid to defend their national prerogatives.
The action plan recognises that the legal framework needs to be improved, urges rapid legislative changes, but says that reforms should be based on the results of a review of recent scandals that the ECB and the Commission should finalise by June. This review, labelled in the text as “post-mortem”, is expected to end after EU elections in May, making it very likely that the new European Parliament will shelve the proposed legislative changes, as it often happens with texts rolled out in previous legislatures.
The action plan lists measures that would need to be carried out until 2020 and tries to reduce discretion of national supervisors in applying anti-money laundering rules, which in some states have been executed too leniently. Under the plan, supervisors will have to clarify existing rules for assessing whether bank managers are fit for their job and on the withdrawal of banking licenses for serious breaches of anti money-laundering rules. National authorities are also requested to cooperate more closely, but without new binding requirements on exchanging information. The Commission is invited to make proposals for other possible changes.