MEPs evaluate Western Balkans' progress

In resolutions adopted on Tuesday, Foreign Affairs Committee MEPs marked the progress made in five Western Balkan countries on their path towards possible EU accession as well as expressed their concern about those countries' development. Following the committee votes, the resolutions are scheduled to be tabled for a plenary vote during the November mini plenary session in Brussels.

Serbia

In a report adopted by 49 votes to 3 with 6 abstentions, MEPs welcomed Serbia’s continued engagement on the path of integration into the EU and called for this strategic decision to be actively promoted among the Serbian public. They also highlighted Serbia’s efforts to normalise ties with neighbouring Kosovo and supported the dialogue facilitated by the EU as the framework to reach a comprehensive normalisation agreement. While taking note of the recent debate on possible exchanges of territories between Serbia and Kosovo, MEPs however underlined that ethnically homogenous states should not be the objective in the region, and that they would only consider any future agreement acceptable if mutually agreed between Serbia and Kosovo.

MEPs also urged Serbian authorities to step up reform efforts on the rule of law, intensify the fight against corruption and organised crime, and continue to reform the country’s public administration to make it more politically neutral. Serbia should also be more aligned with the EU’s foreign and security policy, including on Russia, and within the UN.

Kosovo

Although MEPs welcome the legislation passed within the European Reform Agenda, they expressed concern at the lack of cross-party consensus and lingering political polarisation in Kosovo, which continues to adversely affect the path to sustainable reform.Thus MEPs considered the visa liberalisation as a vital step for Kosovo to get closer to the EU. The European Parliament welcomed the EC confirmation that the visa liberalisation benchmarks have been fulfilled, but this comes notwithstanding critical concerns about Kosovo’s under-financed judiciary, widespread corruption, elements of state capture and undue political influence and due process, which all need to be addressed beyond the progress made on meeting visa liberalisation requirements.

The resolution also took note that five EU member states have not yet recognised Kosovo and invited them to do so, since this would ease relations between Kosovo and neighbouring Serbia. The text was approved by 42 votes to 10 with 6 abstentions.

Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM)

Regarding Macedonia MEPs praised the country’s strong commitment to fully implementing the 2015 Pržino Agreement and the Urgent Reform priorities, which has led to intensified efforts on EU reform. They also called on the national authorities to intensify the fight against money laundering and conflicts of interest, to better shield the judiciary from political interference, ensure the independence of media outlets and address remaining rule of law problems. The resolution was approved by 47 votes to 9, with 1 abstention.

Following the uncertain outcome of the referendum inFYROM on 30 September 2018 (which sought public support to change the country’s name to the Republic of North Macedonia), MEPs encouraged the government in Skopje to do what is necessary to honour the 17 June Prespa agreement between the country and Greece, which opens the door to EU and NATO accession negotiations.

Albania

In a resolution adopted by 44 votes to 5, with 5 abstentions, MEPs welcomed Albania’s steady progress on EU-related reforms and the further steps taken to boost the independence and professionalism of the country’s judiciary.

While commending the significant improvements made by Albania to strengthen its legal and institutional framework, as well as the progress achieved in the fight against organised crime, MEPs also remained concerned over the high level of corruption, the lingering slow pace and inefficiency of the justice system and the fact that rule-of-law deficiencies and cumbersome regulatory procedures continue to deter investment in the country. Nevertheless, the resolution endorsed the path set out by the Council to open EU accession negotiations with Albania in June 2019, provided that the country meets all necessary conditions.

Montenegro

While Montenegro is making good progress overall in the EU integration process, MEPs called on the country’s political leadership to prioritise tackling problems with the rule of law, media freedom, corruption, money laundering, organised crime and its associated violence.

The resolution, approved by 47 votes to 5 with 5 abstentions, underlined Montenegro’s efforts for constructive regional cooperation and good bilateral neighbourly relations. MEPs also welcomed the ratification of the State Border Agreement between Montenegro and Kosovo, and called for outstanding border disputes with other neighbouring countries to be resolved quickly.

The text finally recalled the strategic importance of Montenegro’s NATO accession on 5 June 2017 for ensuring stability and peace in the Western Balkans.

Similar articles

  • EP to vote for Romania, Bulgaria accession to Schengen

    EP to vote for Romania, Bulgaria accession to Schengen

    The European Parliament members will vote today on a resolution that demands the accession of Romania and Bulgaria in the Schengen Area. The non-legislative resolution calls on the EU Council to take a positive decision as soon as possible on admitting both countries into the borderless Schengen Zone.

    14
  • Stricter testing around pesticide permissions

    Stricter testing around pesticide permissions

    The authorisation procedure for pesticides such as glyphosate must be fundamentally reformed, urged PEST Committee MEPs, adopting on 6 December with a wide majority the report authored by Belgian Green MEP Bart Staes and German EPP MEP Norbert Lins. The paper calls on national governments and the Commission to step up environmental and health assessments of pesticides and pesticide active substances, to ensure that no conflicts of interest affect the authorisation procedure and to make risk assessments transparent.

    19